Assessment Workbook BSBMGT502
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Assessment Workbook BSBMGT502
Manage people performance
Review the National Camper Trailers Pty. Ltd. NCT Business Plan, HR Strategic Plan and HR Operational Plan.
These documents will provide you with the necessary consultation and knowledge to develop the following required Work Plans.
Develop two (2) Work Plans.
- Work Plan: For a Position Description; and
- Work Plan: For a formal Warning Process.
We recommend utilizing the templates below to complete this activity and update each point provided.
However, if developing your own template, please ensure that you include the following:
- Allocate work in a way that is efficient
- Cost-effectiveness
- Outcome focused
- Confirm standards and code of conduct
- Work outputs with related teams and individuals
- Agreed performance indicators with relevant staff prior to commencement of work
- Risk analysis in accordance with the organizational risk management plan (Likelihood v’s Consequence)
Work Plan – National Camper Trailers Goal: Develop Position Descriptions
Manager to create position description for employment opportunities available now and in the future
Objectives Action/ Responsibility Performance Outcome/s Measurement Timeframe Risk -Rating Consultation process and allocation of deliverables In this section detail the parties involved in developing the deliverables and producing the desired outcomes including standards and code of practice. What is the desired outcome? Include work outcomes with relevant teams and individuals.
Develop specific statements of the KPI’s or KRA’s.
How will this be measured? Provide quantitative benchmarks that allow the project deliverables to be assessed for effectiveness
Provide start and end dates or timeframes What is the organisational risk for this action? What is the likelihood of negative impact and potential harm with this aspect of the project?
(High, Medium, Low, Negligible.)
Time/Budget allocation In this section detail the parties involved in developing the deliverables and producing the desired outcomes. How will this be achieved in a cost effective and efficient manner.
What is the desired outcome? Develop specific statements of the KPI’s or KRA’s.
How will this be measured? Provide quantitative benchmarks that allow the project deliverables to be assessed for effectiveness
Provide start and end dates or timeframes What is the organisational risk for this action? What is the likelihood of negative impact and potential harm with this aspect of the project?
(High, Medium, Low, Negligible.)
Adherence to organisational standards In this section detail the parties involved in developing the deliverables and producing the desired outcomes. What is the desired outcome? Develop specific statements of the KPI’s or KRA’s.
How will this be measured? Provide quantitative benchmarks that allow the project deliverables to be assessed for effectiveness
Provide start and end dates or timeframes What is the organisational risk for this action? What is the likelihood of negative impact and potential harm with this aspect of the project?
(High, Medium, Low, Negligible.)
Work Plan – National Camper Trailers Goal: Develop Formal Warning Process Manager to create effective performance management processes ensuring a harmonious and productive workplace which is beneficial for both employees and employer
Objective Action/Responsibility Performance Outcome/s Measurement Timeframe Risk Rating Consultation process and allocation of deliverables In this section detail the parties involved in developing the deliverables and producing the desired outcomes. How will this be achieved in a cost effective and efficient manner.
What is the desired outcome? Develop specific statements of the KPI’s or KRA’s.
When is this to be finalised?
How will this be measured? Provide quantitative benchmarks that allow the project deliverables to be assessed for effectiveness
Provide start and end dates or timeframes What is the organisational risk for this action? What is the likelihood of negative impact and potential harm with this aspect of the project?
(High, Medium, Low, Negligible.)
Time/Budget allocation In this section detail the parties involved in developing the deliverables and producing the desired outcomes. How will this be achieved in a cost effective and efficient manner.
What is the desired outcome? Develop specific statements of the KPI’s or KRA’s.
How will this be measured? Provide quantitative benchmarks that allow the project deliverables to be assessed for effectiveness
Provide start and end dates or timeframes What is the organisational risk for this action? What is the likelihood of negative impact and potential harm with this aspect of the project?
(High, Medium, Low, Negligible.)
Adherence to organisational standards In this section detail the parties involved in developing the deliverables and producing the desired outcomes. What is the desired outcome? Develop specific statements of the KPI’s or KRA’s.
How will this be measured? Provide quantitative benchmarks that allow the project deliverables to be assessed for effectiveness
Provide start and end dates or timeframes What is the organisational risk for this action? What is the likelihood of negative impact and potential harm with this aspect of the project?
(High, Medium, Low, Negligible.)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Assessment Workbook BSBMGT502