Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Assignment: Applying Leadership Theories
Assessment Goals and Objectives of the Assignment
Analyze the company you evaluated in Week 2. Apply leadership theories and practices to help organizations evolve in ways that are consistent with their mission and values. You’ll be judged on how well you defend your opinion of the leadership style.
Apple, Coca-Cola, Nike, Starbucks, and WalMart are examples of corporations that may not be chosen for your tasks. A 50 percent point deduction will be levied if one of these companies is employed for an assignment.
For your Leadership Styles Rationale assignment, write a 700- to 1050-word paper. Complete the following in your paper:
Reiterate the organization’s need for change.
Examine the various leadership styles you learned about in Week 3 in light of the organization’s culture and suggested changes.
Justify which leadership style or technique would be most effective in facilitating organizational change.
Discuss how this leadership style will contribute to long-term organizational success.
Examine how this approach ties the organization’s mission and vision together.
Discuss how this approach will benefit stakeholders.
Please turn in your assignment.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Assignment, Applying Leadership Theories |
Assignment, Applying Leadership Theories