Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Assignment: Constitutional Reform Discussion
Julia had planned to gather the citizens of the Republic of Zulu for a crucial constitutional reform discussion one day.
lawsDescription
The Task at Hand:
Julia had planned to gather the citizens of the Republic of Zulu for a crucial constitutional reform discussion one day. The Republic of Zulu surprised her by prohibiting her from holding the meeting under Section 100 of the Public Gathering Act, CAP 60 of the Zulu statutes (hereinafter referred to as the Public A Gathering Act). https://essayharbour.info/2021/06/15/neurological-systemdiscuss-the-following describe-major-changes-that-occurs-on/ Any person who wishes to convene an assembly, public meeting, or form a procession in any public place shall first make application in that behalf to the regulating officer of the area concerned, and, if such officer is satisfied that such assembly, public meeting, or procession is unlikely to cause or lead to a breach of the peace, such officer shall grant such application.
The Constitution of the Republic of Zulu is similar to that of Zambia. https://essaypandit.com/once-a-software-application-has-been-implemented-and-released-that-is-by-no-mea/ Julia approaches you after knowing that you are a constitutional lawyer from Zambia on holiday in the Republic of Zulu, and she asks whether there is anything she can do about her condition. Please guide Julia on how to use the IRAC or IPAC methods.
Specifications:
With New Times Romans 12 point font, standard margins, and single-spaced, you should be able to write at least 500 (but no more than 750) words for the entire project.
To cite authority, you must utilize footnotes.
The student’s own words must be reflected in the analysis and conclusion. https://theeliteessaywriters.com/2021/06/15/s-you-progress-through-the-modules-of-the-course-you-are-learning-how-the-unite/
Rather than summarizing what is in the paper, the conclusion must reflect the student’s point of view.
Plagiarism will not be tolerated, and it will result in a 0 grade for the assignment.
*For grading purposes, consult the rubric.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Assignment, Constitutional Reform Discussion