Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Explain the impact of faulty intelligence sharing on the 9/11 attack in the Homeland Security Recommendations Assignment. Compare and contrast the sharing of law enforcement information before and after 9/11.
Describe the usefulness of Joint Terrorism Task Forces and evaluate their effectiveness. Choose one JTTF to use as an example. Give an example of a successful operation and describe the separate components of the chosen JTTF.
Identify and discuss other examples of multijurisdictional collaboration in homeland security issues than JTTFs. In what other ways do we see the federal government, states, local governments, and private businesses bearing the burdens of national security?
Examine the hazards that illegal immigration poses to U.S. security, as well as the obstacles of border protection. Describe the various ways that insecure borders might pose a security danger, keeping in mind that terrorism is only one component of the larger picture.
Examine the initiatives aimed at addressing the threats mentioned in the previous sections.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Homeland Security Recommendations