Assignment, Managerial Discussion Questions

July 16, 2021

Assignment, Managerial Discussion Questions

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Assignment: Managerial Discussion Questions

1. A manager suggests that a company’s performance be improved by increasing the value of its product to customers. Give three examples of how this advice could be wrong (Hint: Think about what else might or might not change that affects profit.)

2.When the United Kingdom voted to leave the Eurozone, the pound fell by 17% against the dollar. It also fueled fears of the Eurozone collapsing. Explain how the euro/dollar exchange rate would be affected by this fear.

3.Describe how a change in the exchange rate affected your industry using shifts in supply and demand curves. The axes should be labeled, and the geographic, product, and time dimensions of the demand and supply curves you’re drawing should be stated. Make specific references to the demand and supply curves to explain what happened to industry price and quantity. How can you profit from future exchange rate fluctuations? What methods do you use to forecast future changes in the exchange rate?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met