Associative Thinking, Networking, Questioning, Experimenting, and Observation
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Associative Thinking, Networking, Questioning, Experimenting, and Observation
A title and a references page. Four pages are the body of work. APA format applies.
- The body should follow this exact outline.
- Part 1 – Identify your chosen innovation to discuss. It may be a historical product, a current technology product, or a process.
- Part 2– Identify, from your research, the innovation “TYPE(s)” that were used by the innovator(s). For your guideline, you may use the “types” discussed in the lecture document. These would be Disruptive, Sustaining, Research, or Breakthrough. Identify WHY you have chosen the type(s) that you have chosen.
- Part 3 – Identify, from your research, the innovation “SKILLS(s)” that were used by the innovator(s). For your guideline, you may use the “skills” discussed in the lecture document. These would be Associative Thinking, Networking, Questioning, Experimenting, and Observation. Note how associative thinking “drags” all others behind it.
- Part 4 – Identify the “creation category” either cultural creation or commercial creation and provide reasoning for your choice.
- Part 5 – Wrap up the document with a summary paragraph on your learning perspective of the topic.
APA formatting guidelines must be met. The innovation paper will follow this guideline. The paper will begin with a brief discussion of the innovation chosen. The paper will then discuss what innovation types are evident. Innovation types will be discussed in the lecture, supplemental reading, and Socratic seminar. Key to the paper is to apply critical thinking to “why” the student chose the type. The paper will then discuss the innovation skills that were used in developing the innovation. Key to the paper is to apply critical thinking to “why” the student chose the skill. These will also be discussed in the lecture, supplemental reading, and Socratic seminar.
Formatting
Novice – Non APA, poor formatting, non original writing, cut / paste evidence, line spacing, and font issues. 0points
Competent- APA formatted but missing references. 2points
Proficient – APA format with references. 4points
Grammar
Novice -10 or more grammar errors including spelling, usage, phrasing, or capitalization. 0points
Competent -5-9 grammar errors including spelling, usage, phrasing, or capitalization. 2points
Proficient -0-4 grammar errors including spelling, usage, phrasing, or capitalization. 3points
Types identified and explained
Novice -Too much of the paper written on the innovation and no mention of the types or critical thinking as to why 0points
Competent -Types discussed but no explanation as to why. 3points
Proficient -Types and why fully discussed. 5points
Skills identified and explained
Novice -Too much of the paper written on the innovation and no mention of the skills and and critical thinking as to why. 0points
Competent -Skills discussed but no explanation as to why. 3points
Proficient -Skills and why fully discussed 5points
Creation Category Identified and Explained
Novice – Not Included 0points
Included but not explained 2points
Included and explained 3points
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results