Attitudes that are genuine and those that are not Philosophical Issues

Attitudes that are genuine and those that are not Philosophical Issues

Instructions:

Attitudes that are genuine and those that are not Philosophical Issues

Answer ONE of the following prompts in an essay of 1,200 to 1,500 words. This assignment is due in DOC, DOCX, or RTF format on Wednesday, April 21st at 10 a.m. Pacific time. The paper must be written in a clear and concise manner, using proper grammar and punctuation, and following the standard Philosophy paper format.

1. Discuss Soren Kierkegaard’s perspective on the relationship between faith and reason. Discuss whether he is correct in choosing faith over reason.

2. Describe and critically evaluate Friedrich Nietzsche’s perspective on how we should conduct a “reevaluation of values” to determine which morality to follow in our daily lives.

3. According to Martin Heidegger, what is the difference between authentic and inauthentic attitudes toward death? Consider whether a genuine attitude toward death is required to live a meaningful life.

4. Describe what Jean-Paul Sartre means when he says, “Hell is other people.” Examine whether he is correct in his assertions.

5. Describe Simone de Beauvoir’s perspective on what it means to be a woman. Examine whether and/or to what extent her analysis is still valid today.

6. According to Albert Camus, how is the myth of Sisyphus an allegory for all human existence? Examine whether he is correct in his assertion that all human life is relevantly similar to Sisyphus’s situation.

Here are some pointers to keep in mind:

• Identify the topic/question, inform the reader of the position you will be arguing for, and provide an outline of your paper in your introduction.

What your introduction should not do is include non-essential information (for example, a biography of the philosopher), or begin to provide argument or analysis.

• In philosophy papers, self-reference is acceptable, even preferred (e.g., “I will argue that…”).

• Use rhetorical questions sparingly (asked but unanswered). If you want to make a point, say it out loud. In general, only one question should be asked at a time. • Make certain that you respond to the specific prompt and not something vaguely related to it. Also, make sure you answer all of the prompt’s questions. • Repetition should be avoided (except for your introduction & conclusion). If you find yourself repeating yourself, rethink your paper’s structure. • When explaining a

philosophical theory, argument, example, or other concept, try to figure out what the most general or abstract point is intended to convey. • Jargon tips: In a philosophy paper, “valid” means “follows logically from the premises,” not “true” or

“plausible.” To “beg the question,” or “assume your conclusion in your premises,” is to argue in circles. It does not imply that the question is being asked. • If you make any claims about a philosopher’s views that aren’t self-evident, you should

back them up with a page reference. • Every philosophy paper (at least for this course) should include a critical discussion. A careful and balanced critical discussion is required for a good critical discussion. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t

take sides, but it does mean you should always consider what an intelligent opponent might say in reply to your points or arguments, and respond accordingly. • Write confidently and assertively when making claims and conclusions; don’t start

every sentence with “I believe” or “In my opinion,” etc. If you ever write “I believe…”, you should follow up with “Because…”. • When referring to humanity, avoid using the words “man” or “mankind”; gender-neutral language is now the norm and

expectation in academic writing. Use terms like “people” and “humans” when referring to humanity in general. You can use gender-neutral terms like “they” or alternate between “he” and “she” when talking about generic human individuals (while staying consistent within a single example). • Don’t overextend yourself. It is preferable to go over a few key points in depth rather than skim over a large number of topics.

Attitudes that are genuine and those that are not Philosophical Issues

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Attitudes that are genuine and those that are not Philosophical Issues

Attitudes that are genuine and those that are not Philosophical Issues

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!