Author’s General Purpose in Writing Case Study
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Author’s General Purpose in Writing Case Study
Questions to ask and answer before turning in your summary paper
- What academic format have you put your paper in? MLA, Chicago, APA, CBE? Is it the format that your discipline uses? It should be. Find out. You can fall back on a default format for Summary #2, but use your discipline’s format going forward.
- Did you figure out how the author structured the article?
- What is the author’s general purpose in writing?
- Did you annotate your article?
- Did you complete the template for your second summary like you did for your first summary? (optional)
- Did you divide your article into sections? By sections I mean the structure of the article as written in by the author?
- Did you sum up in one or two sentences the central idea of the passage (easy to do this by using “what/who/why/where/how” template)
- Did you summarize each section with a single sentence summary?
- Would your audience be able to read your summary instead of the original and still get the most important points that the author intended? How so? Explain what you left out.
- Have you had anyone read your summary to help improve the paper?
- Have you read your paper out loud to yourself or had someone else read it aloud to you?
- Have you done a backwards reading of your paper to check your paper for errors?
- Have you included a works cited/references/bibliography page?
- Have you checked this paper against the original and revised to make it is more accurate and complete?
- Have you considered what you have written from the eyes of your audience? For example, is there a nice flow from start to finish that reflects the organization of the original? Have you left out too much, left out too little?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow General Purpose in Writing