BA 3308 Written Assignment for Non-Accounting Majors

BA 3308 Written Assignment for Non-Accounting Majors

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839

Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

BA 3308 Written Assignment for Non-Accounting Majors

BA 3308 Written Assignment for Non-accounting Majors

The final course requirement for Ethics is a final paper on applied ethics, of approximately 5 pp. double spaced, in length.

This paper should be a statement and defense of what you think about some controversial moral and/

or social issue from the list of allowable topics. It is due per the syllabus at end of day on March 8, 2018.

The paper should be in the following form:

1. Thesis statement.

2. Arguments in favor of the thesis statement.

a. Examples or evidence to support the thesis statement.

3. Arguments in opposition to the thesis statement.

a. Examples or evidence in opposition to the thesis statement.

4. Identify the stakeholders involved in the situation addressed by the thesis statement.

5. State whether you have personally experienced or witnessed the situation described in the thesis statement and describe or if not, describe what you would do if you did experience the situation.

6. Conclusion.

The final paper will be graded along the following criteria:

Having a clear and identifiable thesis statement. Using arguments and evidence for that thesis statement through arguments and/or evidence. Most of the grade will be based on this element, so be sure to elaborate your arguments and evidence fully.

Following the outline shown above, 1-6.

Standard term paper guidelines. Proofread for errors, including spelling and grammar. Consult my Writing Tips for common errors not to make and use the Writing Center as necessary. That is why they are there. If you use outside sources, be sure to cite them per APA style format. Consult the College of Business Writing Rubric that is in Blackboard for guidance.

Pick a topic where you feel there is room for reasonable disagreement.

Defend what you really think. Don’t feel the need to pigeonhole yourself into a preset option on

your topic.

Topics where you have relevant personal experience are recommended. Your experience will

often give you a perspective on the issue that others lack.

Address potential objections–recognizing weaknesses and potential objections will always make the paper better as it indicates the level of serious thought put into the paper.

I am interested in substantive content. Avoid filler material that does not add to the paper, such as “We all know that ethical decisions are one of the hardest decisions to make…”.

Write for a reasonably well educated audience.

Here are the topics to choose from:

When, if ever, is whistleblowing morally permissible?

Are employment at will contracts just?

Are affirmative action policies in hiring morally acceptable?

Are deception and bluffing in business deals morally acceptable?

What are the ethical obligations or salespeople?

Are sweatshops morally permissible?

BA 3308 Written Assignment for Non-Accounting Majors

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BA 3308 Written Assignment for Non-Accounting Majors

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!