Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Instructions
The following are some basic English arguments. Choose one argument and translate it into Predicate Logic symbols. For assistance translating, consult the translation chart on page 481 of your text. Then, to prove the argument’s validity, use one of the indirect proof procedures with the Rules of Inference and Equivalence from Chapter 8.
Create an alternate proof next. To put it another way, if you proofed with RAA, now use CP; if you proofed with CP, now use RAA. In your diary response, also consider the following questions:
Will a direct proof (one that doesn’t rely on assumptions like CP and RAA) work for any of these?
Is it possible to speed up the proof by using various Equivalence rules?
Arguments:
There are some rights that are unassailable. Alienable rights, on the other hand, can be relinquished. As a result, some rights are unalienable. (Rx: a right; Wx: a right that can be waived; Ax: a right that can be alienated)
Causally dependent entities are all contingent beings. There are no causally dependent entities. Every physical entity is subject to change. Physical entity, all atoms are. We can deduce that no atom is required to exist. (Cx denotes a contingent being; Dx denotes a causally dependent being; Nx denotes a necessary being; Px denotes a physical entity; Ax denotes an atom)
There is a being that has more power than all other beings. As a result, at least one entity is stronger than it. (Mxy: x is stronger than y.)
Physical mechanisms underpin all brain functions. There are no tangible mental processes. As a result, every mental function in the brain is also an intangible process. (Bx: x represents a mental process; Px: x represents a physical process; Mx: x represents a mental process; Tx: x represents a tangible process.)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Basic Formal Logic Journal of Predicate Logic |
Basic Formal Logic Journal of Predicate Logic