BBA211 Evaluating Cross Cultural Business Problems
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
BBA211 Evaluating Cross Cultural Business Problems
Title
Imagine that you run a Business School and you are considering international expansion. Write a report that analyses this strategy.
Context
This organisation is wishing to expand internationally and needs to determine and analyse factors that will favour (or not) expanding to this region. The organization is diverse in nature. Create a business report that includes the following 5 sections in which you answer what factors should be considered in the organisation’s decision about whether to carry out this international expansion or not.
Structure
Part a: Executive Summary (max 1 page)
Part b: Background
In this section you should provide an introduction that describes the layout of the report and the factors that will be addressed. You will need to:
- Briefly introduce the organisation you have chosen and present the organisation’s policy and strategy, vision and mission, ethical values.
- In this section you should also choose a country or region that would be an option for the organisation to carry out its expansion in to and explain why you chose this country or region.
Part c: The country for expansion
Here in this section, for your country there will be a 3 to 4 pages report determining the issues the organization would face if it decided to locate/expand there. Reference should be made to organisation’s policy and strategy, vision and mission, ethics, human resources (HR) management, marketing management and finance issues relating to a choice to locate in this country.
Explain in this section the link between regional strategies and global influences and the meaning of Glocalization. Relate all this concepts to your concrete case. You should also address the social, technological, economic, environmental, political, legal, ethical, and security issues that the organisation may face by choosing to locate in the country you have chosen to write about. You will need to provide credible and correctly referenced data in support of your arguments.
Part d: Discussion, conclusion and recommendations
In this section you need to make recommendations for whether the organisation should go ahead with the proposed expansion in to your chosen country or not. You should include a discussion of the attitudes which favour working multiculturally, strategies that create a competitive advantage for international expansion and the advantages of culturally diverse teams in this section.
Part e: Bibliography minimum six references must be provided using the Harvard referencing system.
Formalities:
- Wordcount: …
- Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.
- Font: Arial 12,5 pts.
- Text alignment: Justified.
- The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.
Submission deadline: Sunday, 24th of May 2020 at 23:59
Weight: This task is a 100% of your total grade for this subject.
Rubrics
Exceptional 90-100
Good 80-89
Fair 70-79
Fail <70
Knowledge & understanding (25%)
Student demonstrates a systematic and thorough understanding of the theory delivered in class, applying relevant knowledge to the question. Student demonstrates good understanding of the theory delivered in class, applying some relevant knowledge to the question (some minor details might be missing) Student demonstrates some understanding of the theory delivered in class, applying some knowledge to the question (key details might be missing and there may be some irrelevance) Student demonstrates an insufficient understanding of the theory delivered in class. Key knowledge is not applied to the in question and information is of little or no relevance. Critical evaluation (35%)
Student critically engages with theory and its application, considering alternative perspectives/ possibilities with authority. Makes excellently sound judgements in the absence of complete data
Student makes a good attempt at critically engaging with theory and its application, considering alternative perspectives/ possibilities. Makes good judgements in the absence of complete data
Student makes some attempt at critically engaging with theory and/or its application. Makes some judgements in the absence of complete data
Student makes no attempt to critically engage with theory or application. Fails to make judgements in the absence of complete data
Communication (20%)
Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, making excellent use of visuals to support their message. Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, making good use of visuals to support their message. Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. Visuals are used to support their message successfully at times. Student fails to communicate their ideas clearly and concisely. Visuals are poor and do not support the message. Synthesis (20%)
Student synthesizes the content of their presentation with exceptional clarity and concision Student synthesizes the content of their presentation with some clarity and concision Student synthesizes the content of their presentation, although work lacks clarity and/or concision Student makes an insufficient attempt to synthesize, with a lack of clarity and concision. BBA211 Evaluating Cross Cultural Business Problems
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow