BC Green Economy Waterway Superfund Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
BC Green Economy Waterway Superfund Discussion
THIS FOLDER CONTAINS THE ASSIGNMENTS FOR PART 1 OF WEEK 7 OF THE SEMESTER. COMPLETE THE LISTED ITEMS BELOW, WHICH CAN BE FOUND WITHIN THIS FOLDER.
Chapter 21 Assignment
- Read through chapter 21, Water Pollution, taking notes on key concepts, terms and examples discussed within the chapter.
- Complete Homework Assignment #10
Lab 10: Water Quality
- Complete the lab 10 exercise by reading through the introduction materials, complete the reading understanding questions within the lab 10 exercise link, conduct the lab 10 experiments (you will need to submit photos of your lab experiments) and submit your lab experiments responses and photos within the labeled lab experiment lin
THIS FOLDER CONTAINS THE ASSIGNMENTS FOR PART 2 OF WEEK 7 OF THE SEMESTER. COMPLETE THE LISTED ITEMS BELOW, WHICH CAN BE FOUND WITHIN THIS FOLDER.
Chapter 23 Assignment
- Read through chapter 23, Solid and Hazardous Waste, taking notes on key concepts, terms and examples discussed within the chapter.
- Complete Homework Assignment #11
Discussion Board Topic 5: Superfund Sites
- Create a thread commenting on the questioned I posed within my thread listed as Discussion 5 – Superfund Sites
- Discuss with two classmates by commenting on their threads. One or two sentence comments are not a conversation and will not count as full credit, so please have a discussion with your classmates.
Lab 11: Risk Assessment lab exercise
- Complete the Lab 11: Risk assessment lab exercise by downloading the word document and completing it using the provided data and additional websites.
BC Green Economy Waterway Superfund Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow