Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA)
Discussion 3 Review the Negotiations
Please follow the links and view the three videos. Address the bulleted items in 150 to 200 words or more.
Below there are three movie negotiations video links each of them deals with a different aspect of negotiations. Please view each video and address the questions that are related to different aspects of a negotiation. You may use additional research to support your answers and remember to cite your sources. Then respond to at least two classmates posts.
Based you post on the following questions:
A Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA) is a required part of negotiation planning. What were the lessons learned?
Your position of power in the negotiation is important to determine before the negotiation and during. From the videos what important ideas did you take away?
Most of the work you will put into your negotiation is in preparation. If you were to offer these negotiators advice, what areas would you have them better prepare?
1) Analysis of a Negotiation
2) Analysis of Negotiation Scenes From Movie Jobs (2013) by Abdullah Fikri
3) Analysis of Negotiation Scenes From Movie Erin Brockovich (2000), by Avi Bellerizki
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement