BMECP implementation ideas to enlarge the profits margin solution

 BMECP implementation ideas to enlarge the profits margin

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

BMECP implementation ideas to enlarge the profits margin

BMECP implementation ideas to enlarge the profits margin

Individual reflection

• What did the project do?

The project has involved a marketing plan for a charity called…. The company does not have a sufficient market share to cover their expenses and earn a good amount of profits. Thus, our team which is from five people has created a marketing plan in order to increase their market share and make it well known in the market. In addition, the project involved official meetings between us and the client (BMECP manager), to share information and explore about their exact needs.

• What did the project achieve?

The project has achieved a better knowledge about competitors, which might help BMECP in implementing new ideas in order to enlarge the profits margin. In addition, we gave some recommendations for the BMECP

BMECP implementation ideas to enlarge the profits margin

• What did I contribute?

I personally contributed in the project as a primary role. I was organizing the meetings with the client. In addition, I was the link between the client and my colleagues when the client emails me with some information or requirements that have to be done in the report. Furthermore, I was nominated by the client to be an admin on their page on Facebook, in order to make the fundraiser for the BMECP. I took the role of being a team leader, as I assigned the tasks for each of the students, and I collected their work and gathered it in one report. According to Goleman (1998) Leadership is about getting the job done through others, not doing the job yourself. Moreover, I contributed in suggesting ideas for the report structure. Finally, I was the one who gathered the information about competitors to organize the visits to them. Although, I visited the friends centre which is the main competitor for BMECP, and I created a list of differences between the BMECP and Friends Centre strengths and weaknesses.

• What did I learn?

I learnt that leadership is not as easy as every student thinks. Because the leader has to manage the group and split the tasks between them equally. In addition, I gained a better experience in applying the theories and models in the real life with a real client.

• How will I take this learning forward into my working life after university?

After the bachelor’s degree, I am planning to do master in project management. Therefore, I will be a manager one day, because I am planning too to manage my own business in the future. Thus, the work we have done in this project has taught me how to be professional with other parties from other firms. However, McClelland (1973) states that traditional cognitive intelligence simply could not predict how well people would perform in the work place

BMECP implementation ideas to enlarge the profits margin

• What would I/we do differently next time in a similar situation?

The project’s structure was well organised and communicated perfectly between students. In addition, the communication between the team and the client was smooth and on a frequent basis. However, there were always late replies from the client if we need any information or data. In a situation like that in the future, we would be giving certain deadlines for an information to be submitted with exact dates. In order to organize the tasks and work more sufficiently.

BMECP implementation ideas to enlarge the profits margin

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

BMECP implementation ideas to enlarge the profits margin

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!