Brain-controlled prosthetics for amputees
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Brain-controlled prosthetics for amputees
Brain-controlled prosthetics are a type of prosthetic limb that can be controlled directly by the brain of the user. They are a promising development in the field of prosthetics because they can provide a greater degree of natural movement and dexterity than traditional prosthetic limbs.
The basic idea behind brain-controlled prosthetics is that they use electrodes implanted in the user’s brain to detect the user’s intentions and translate them into movements of the prosthetic limb. The electrodes pick up signals from the motor cortex, which is the part of the brain that controls movement, and these signals are then used to control the prosthetic limb.
The first step in using brain-controlled prosthetics is to implant the electrodes in the user’s brain. This is done through a surgical procedure in which the electrodes are placed in the motor cortex. The electrodes are then connected to a computer that can interpret the signals from the brain and translate them into movements of the prosthetic limb.
Once the electrodes are in place and the computer is set up, the user can begin to learn how to control the prosthetic limb using their thoughts. This is done through a process called “training,” in which the user practices moving the prosthetic limb using their thoughts while the computer translates those thoughts into movements of the limb.
The training process can be challenging, but it is also very rewarding. With practice, users can learn to control their prosthetic limbs with a high degree of accuracy and precision, and can perform a wide range of tasks that were previously impossible with traditional prosthetic limbs.
One of the key benefits of brain-controlled prosthetics is that they can provide a much greater degree of natural movement and dexterity than traditional prosthetic limbs. Because the user is able to control the limb directly with their thoughts, the movements of the limb can be much more fluid and intuitive. This can make it easier for users to perform a wide range of tasks, from simple movements like grasping objects to more complex tasks like playing musical instruments or participating in sports.
Another benefit of brain-controlled prosthetics is that they can help to reduce the sense of “phantom limb” that many amputees experience. Phantom limb is the feeling that the amputated limb is still present, and can be very uncomfortable and even painful for some amputees. By providing a prosthetic limb that can be controlled directly by the brain, brain-controlled prosthetics can help to reduce the sense of phantom limb and improve the overall comfort and well-being of the user.
There are, of course, some challenges associated with brain-controlled prosthetics. One of the main challenges is the need for a surgical procedure to implant the electrodes in the user’s brain. This can be risky and may not be feasible for all amputees. In addition, the training process can be time-consuming and may require a significant amount of effort on the part of the user.
Despite these challenges, brain-controlled prosthetics are a promising development in the field of prosthetics, and have the potential to significantly improve the lives of amputees. With further research and development, it is likely that brain-controlled prosthetics will become more widely available and more effective in the years to come.
Brain-controlled prosthetics for amputees
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow