Building Teams and Revolving Conflict
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Building Teams and Revolving Conflict
400 Words/ No plagiarism
Teams have been used in organizations for many years. As the need to streamline operations to gain or maintain competitive advantage increases, the use of cross-functional or cross-departmental teams is increasing. Coupling this with the common management style of management by objectives (MBO), address the following questions:
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a cross-functional and a cross-departmental team?
When resources are scarce and one group in the equation meets their goals at the expense of the other failing due to lack of resources, how would you address the conflict that could arise?
When creating the objectives for the team, how should the target goals be set? Should the team members play an active role in setting the target goals for each group within the team? Explain.
What conflict resolution techniques do you believe would be the most effective in a cross-departmental or cross-functional team? How would you alter these techniques for a virtual team?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Building Teams and Revolving Conflict