BUS600 Foundational Skills for Academic Research Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
BUS600 Foundational Skills for Academic Research Paper
Type of Assessment: Assessment 1 – Individual Assessment
Unit Learning Outcomes addressed:
- a) Analyze and reflect critically on a range of materials and sources presented in written, spoken, visual and numerical format.
- b) Describe and discuss the key features, constituent process and constraints of academic research.
- c) Communicate ideas and concepts in language and structure appropriate to an academic research context.
- d) Articulate and express ideas and information in academic format as specified by the Excelsia College minimum academic standards, including appropriate use of the APA referencing style.
- e) Understand the personal, intellectual and practical requirements for successful research at a postgraduate level.
Criteria for Assessment:
- Demonstrated understanding of the structure and content of a peer-reviewed article.
- Demonstrated ability to discuss academic research with clarity
and coherence, and to sustain argumentation on points of theoretical and methodological substance and/or concern.
Assessment Task:
Task 1a. Write an article summary
Students are required to select one empirical, peer-reviewed journal article and write a one page summary analysis (single space, 12 font size) to be submitted online via Turnitin in week 9. Your summary should include responses to the following:
- What is the topic?
- What is the research question/problem/ hypothesis?
- What are the predictions and the rationale for these predictions?
- What methods were used (participants, sampling, materials, procedure)?
- What were the main results?
- Are the findings supported by previous research?
- What are the limitations of the study?
- What are the implications of the findings?
Task 1b: Presentation on the critical thinking process leading to the article summary
Students are also required to create a short presentation of about 5-7 slides, where each student will be expected to demonstrate their mastery of the process of critically analyzing a journal article. Please see the submission guidelines below:
- Design a PPT deck – similar to what you would have done
if presenting in class and submit via Turnitin. (All summative assignments must be submitted via Turnitin).
- Record an AUDIO FILE of their presentation. This can be done in various formats; although the MP3 file format is most commonly used and if compressed is a smaller file than an uncompressed audio or video file.
- Email the file to your Lecturer (Outlook can allow 32MB). If you are unable to attach the file due to size then request your Lecturer to provide you the option of uploading the file on OneDrive; link to be shared with your Lecturer.
Submission Date: Week 9
Total Mark & Weighting:
25 marks | 25%
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):
Assessment Criteria
Total Marks -25
Task 1a. Write an article summary
- Understanding of the structure and content of a peer-reviewed article.
- Demonstrated ability to discuss academic research with clarity and coherence, and to sustain argumentation on points of theoretical and methodological substance and/or concern.
- Using correct referencing style (APA)
Task 1b: Presentation on the critical thinking process leading to the article summary
- Identification and implementation of a critical analysis process/framework.
- Demonstrated understanding of the critical analysis process.
- Demonstrated ability to discuss their critical analysis journey with respect to the process undertaken to analyse the article of their choice.
BUS600 Foundational Skills for Academic Research Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BUS600 Foundational Skills for Academic Research Paper
BUS600 Foundational Skills for Academic Research Paper