BUSI 304 Health Policy Article Discussion Assignment

March 21, 2022

BUSI 304 Health Policy Article Discussion Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

BUSI 304 Health Policy Article Discussion Assignment

Health Policy Article and Letter Assignment Instructions

These instructions cover the article and letter due in weeks 2 and 6. You will address an issue related to a specific legislative policy that affects healthcare in a written article that follows current APA format that you would follow for a paper. Then, you will use your findings to compose a letter that you could send to a legislator. The article must include the following:

Description of the legislative policy with a negative or positive impact on healthcare or public health
Explanation of why the policy is harmful or helpful to healthcare and ultimately to the delivery of quality patient care
Impact of the policy from a cost perspective
Recommendation(s) for policy revision or replacement

The article must be 400–500 words, cite at least 2 peer-reviewed journal articles for support, integrate a biblical worldview, and follow current APA format. The article you write in weeks 2 and 6 must address a different legislative policy.

In addition to the article, you will compose a letter for those concerned about the issue addressed in the article to personalize and send to the appropriate legislator(s). The letter must outline the issue and recommendation(s) for policy revision or replacement and seek the endorsement of the legislator(s). The letter must be 200–250 words and follow current APA format contained after the reference page.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met