BUSI 600 Business Case Study
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
BUSI 600 Business Case Study
For each Case Study Assignment, you will read the assigned case study and analyze the case scenario/research through a series of questions. The overall structure of each case is similar in that each case begins with an abstract followed by a description of the scenario/research and concludes with a discussion about the situation. The discussion is simply a series of unique questions about the case scenario that you will answer as your Case Study Assignment.
No abstract is required for the Case Study Assignment nor are an introduction or conclusion; simply type the questions as an APA style heading and respond. Ensure the following are met:
- Must be supported with at least 4 scholarly (peer reviewed) research articles in your response.
- Must be at least 900 words (the word count does not include the question text, cover page, or reference page)
- Use proper grammar, current APA format and submit in MS Word format
The cases can be found in McGraw Hill Connect or as documents in the Resources section.
The questions for each Case Study Assignment can be found in McGraw Hill Connect as follows:
- Hero Builder’s Case Study Assignment: see case page 2
Criteria Ratings Points
Content – Case Analysis
24 to >22.0 pts
Advanced
Insightful throughout. Completely developed all relevant information. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
22 to >18.0 pts
Proficient
Specific, solid. Less carefully developed. Some insights. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.
18 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Vague, obvious, underdeveloped, or too broad. One or more main issues not identified. Limited evidence of critical thinking. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were not clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Content – Synthesis of course theories/ concepts and case analysis
24 to >22.0 pts
Advanced
Convincingly interpreted and linked to course theories/ concepts. Considers context and limits of position where appropriate. Key points were clearly identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.
22 to >18.0 pts
Proficient
Relevant. Appropriately interpreted and linked to main course theories/concepts. Key points were partially identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.
18 to >0.0 pts
Developing
A few generalized connections made to course theories/concepts. Connections not clearly linked to case. Key points were not identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Content – Application of Scholarly Research
22 to >20.0 pts
Advanced
Author accurately applied 4 or more scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
20 to >18.0 pts
Proficient
Author accurately applied at least 3 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
18 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Author accurately applied 1 or 2 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
0 pts
Not Present
22 pts
Structure – Mechanics
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–1 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Specific, solid. Less carefully developed. Some insights. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
There are more than 3 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI600_C01_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure – APA Style
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
There are 0–1 minor errors in APA format in the required items: title page, running head, font type and size, line spacing, headings, citations, and references.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
There are 2–3 minor errors in APA format in the required items.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
There are more than 3 errors in APA format in the required items.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Structure – Word Count
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The minimum word count 900 words is met. Excluding the cover page and References page(s).
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
The word count of at least 800 words is met. Excluding the cover page and References page(s).
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The word count of 500–799 words. Excluding the cover page and References page(s).
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 100
BUSI 600 Business Case Study
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow