Business Functions to Your Future Career Goals Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Business Functions to Your Future Career Goals Discussion
I don’t know how to handle this Business question and need guidance. Reflect on your five year career goals and what you have learned about the complexity of business decision making in this course. Explain the value of understanding the concerns and interrelationships of the key business functions to your future career goals. If you have broadened or improved any of your professional actions in your current role, discuss that as well.
Submit a writeup that supports your decision about the issue faced by the protagonist in the ACD case. Please limit your paper to TWO pages of single space text in 11-point font, all-inclusive of appendices and calculations, if appropriate. No outside research is needed to analyze the cases.
For the ACD Case writeup (Assignment 1): Describe the core opportunity, highlight the value proposition/opportunity and their accomplishments. You don’t need to write it as a question and answer, instead it should be a free-flowing paragraph that addresses these “meta-level” issues. Then dive right in! Following the introductory paragraph, directly address the questions provided for the ACD case assignment, namely: Is this distribution business viable in the long term? How could ACD become a formidable player in the industry? Should he expand into a west coast location to capture new customers? Where could he find the money needed to finance this growth? What should be his next move?
Business Functions to Your Future Career Goals Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow