Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
Content Type
reply:
by Jose Lenfers
The U.S Business Judgment Rules (BJR) was put in place to help protect corporation’s boards of directors from ridiculous legel allegations about how their business is ran. However, this does not make it that you can run the shadiest business and still be fully protected by the BJR. Boards of directors are presumed to always act in good ways, meaning directors owe some care and loyalty to its shareholders.
If there is evidence that the board violates the rules of conduct of the BJR, courts wont even review or question its decision. Boards also have an obligation to always be informed and act on an informed basis. Finally boards must put the interests of the corporation and its shareholders over the intersts of others. I completely agree that directors should not be liable for an honest mistake with a history of solely doing good things. There must be evidence that they are breaking rules and blatant bad faith in order for them to be penalized.
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
The United Kingdom’s BJR is the company law. They were the first country to draft modern corporation statutes and it is a bit similar to the one in the United States. Management of the corporation is also ran through a board of directors and it limits liability to their commercial creditors in case a business is unable to pay debt. The UK company law also states that it is mandatory to act in good faith of investors.
I would not change anything about the U.S BJR because i think it is extremely fair. If blatant bad faith is present, they should 100% be held liable. It is not an easy task running a business and requires that you make thousands of different decisions, even a person acting in perfect honest good faith can mess up sometimes and they should not be help liable for that one time.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/businessjudgm…
http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/United_Kingdom_…By Bryan Castillo
The U.S. Business Judgment Rule is based on helping protect a corporations head directory of any flippant legal allegations about how the business is ran. Directors making a business decision is what surrounds the topic. I agree with the fact, a corporate director will not be liable and accountable to the corporation for honest mistakes of bad business decisions. If there is evidence of bad faith then of course they should be penalized but if there isn’t a clear reason, I do not see the point of having them liable.
Having a rational basis for the decision they made is one of the three requirements to apply the business judgment rule. In Canada for example, the rules comply the same due to the fact that Canada courts have a similar approach towards U.S. laws. They enforce the duty of care that respects the fact that directors and officers often have expertise that courts do not. Even though in Canada, the business judgment rule is not really a stand-alone rule as a illustration of how the director took care of the duty is presented.
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
Considered decisions and reasonable have to be presented but they do not have to be perfect. Again, the reason Canada has it’s similarities with U.S. is because they are counterparts with them. I believe this is due to the fact U.S. has developed a law that is understandable enough and an appropriate degree of diligence is presented. I would not change anything about the U.S. rule due to the fact that if relevant facts are presented, why hold them liable?
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
Business decisions come with risks and sometimes lead into critical situations but that is what holds companies together. If the evidence shown is valid and the person has acted with good faith then that should be good enough to not hold them liable. “They are not insurers of business success” is what it states in the text and that is the most effective aspect of the rule, because leaving a decision based on a person’s knowledge can vary. Whatever results are presented are held accountable for the entire company for allowing a head officer to decide.
References
https://www.lerners.ca/lernx/business-judgment-rul…
Business Judgment Rule in United States of America
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|