Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
CA103 Public Speaking a Great Skill Discussion
Comparing Notable Speakers
Purpose:
The purpose of this discussion is to help you to identify the various strengths of experienced public speakers by watching them in action. Many of you will find the messages of the speakers to be different from your own views. This will challenge you to concentrate on techniques, rather than content.
Instructions:
To begin, you are going to watch two speeches.
The first speech is Barack Obama delivering the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. At the time, Obama was an Illinois legislator virtually unknown to a national audience, or even within his own party. It was reported at the time that he wrote this speech himself, and convention organizers did not see a copy of the speech until one or two days before it was delivered.
The second speech is Arnold Schwarzenegger delivering the keynote address at the 2004 Republican Convention. Schwarzenegger had recently moved from a very successful acting career into the early portion of a political career as Governor of California. His popularity within his party was strong enough that some suggested changing U.S. law to allow him to run for President of the United States.
For the purposes of this assignment, I ask that you look BEYOND the politics and focus on the delivery techniques used by the two speakers. While you may have some very strongly held beliefs about the politics of either speaker, please try to see the value in both. I also expect your discussion to remain courteous and respectful despite differences of opinion
Click on the links below and watch both of the keynote speeches. Take notes on what each speaker does to enhance his message, keep his audience’s attention and to excite the audience about their cause.
Barack Obama
Text and video are both available at the link below:
Barack Obama Convention Speech
https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/convention2004/barackobama2004dnc.htm
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Text and video are both available at the link below:
Arnold Schwarzenegger Convention Speech
https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/convention2004/arnoldschwarzenegger2004rnc.htm
**Choose only one of the two speakers and identify those things that enhance the quality of the delivery of the speech, such as:
movements;
gestures;
eye contact;
facial expressions;
speech rhythms;
volume;
tone;
types of support;
word choice;
vivid language;
repetition;
alliteration;
similes;
metaphors;
personal anecdotes;
gender-neutral references.
CA103 Public Speaking a Great Skill Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|