Calculating Ecological Footprint at Take a Screen Shot
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Calculating Ecological Footprint at Take a Screen Shot
Environmental Biology Paper
Part 1.
Calculate your ecological footprint at take a screen shot of the Summary (with # of Earths) and Facts and Figures (with pie chart, consumption category and gha), and upload with your answers. How large is
your footprint? How many earths would it take to support a world of people who live like you? Does this surprise you? Explain.
Which consumption category(ies) is/are highest for you? Why? Does this surprise you? List three ways that you might reduce in these categories.
Would you be willing to take these actions? (why/why not?)
In which categories did you consume the least? Do you consciously try to reduce your consumption in this category?
Which Land Type makes up the largest component of your footprint? Why?
What is your overshoot day? What is meant by #movethedate?
Part 2.
Click on the Explore Your Data link. How does your personal footprint compare with the average footprint of people in your home country? Make a table to compare the average footprint of your home country
(in gha) to the average footprint of people in two other countries of your choice. Include the biocapacity of the country and the deficit or reserve (so 3 columns). What does this mean? How can a country make
up for deficits? Discuss the consequences of this.
Calculating Ecological Footprint at Take a Screen Shot
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow