Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Carlos Albizu Central Nervous System Discussion
Read the following article Parents warn of mystery illness misdiagnosed in kids
https://www.ctvnews.ca/parents-warn-of-mystery-illness-misdiagnosed-in-kids-1.701777
Do you feel it is necessary for psychologists to understand the complex details of neurological activity in the brain in order to successfully practice psychology? Why or why not? Do you think the early symptoms noted in this article could be reasonably misdiagnosed? Support your reasoning with information from the text and other course materials.
Discussion Prompt 2
First take the movie perception test.
Watch Video
Movie Perception Test – Conversation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JONMYxaZ_s
Then read the following article on inattentional blindness.
But Did You See the Gorilla? The Problem with Inattentional Blindness
Given what you know about the influences on perception such as context and emotion and the effects of inattentional blindness, would you be confident providing eyewitness testimony against a defendant charged with a crime? How confident would you be of the testimony of others if you were being charged? Explain. Can you think of a situation where you may have missed something, “right in front of your eyes”? Explain the feelings you experienced when you realized what you missed.
Support your ideas with information from the text and other course materials.
Part 2
Biofeedback-Based Interventions Paper
For this assignment you will explore the relationship between neuroscience and behavior by looking at biofeedback and crime? How, or EEG biofeedback.
Address the following points in your paper:
Define and explain biofeedback in your own words.
Distinguish between biofeedback and neurofeedback, or EEG biofeedback.
Describe who uses biofeedback and EEG biofeedback and why (detail at least two professions and purposes).
Explain how an understanding of the nervous system can help us find ways to alleviate disease and pain.
Identify the pros and cons of biofeedback-based interventions (highlight areas related to research, studies, theories, practice).
Identify ethical considerations related to biofeedback-based interventions.
Discuss your point of view with regard to biofeedback-based interventions, such as EEG biofeedback.
Have you had any experiences using EEG biofeedback?
Can you think of a situation in your life or work where you might consider using EEG biofeedback?
Would you recommend biofeedback-based interventions as a useful too? Why or why not?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Carlos Albizu Central Nervous System Discussion |
Carlos Albizu Central Nervous System Discussion