Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Answer the following questions based on the case “Papa John’s International Inc.” (Case 2-3 in Pearson’s etext).
1ST QUESTION
Your friend informs you that she is thinking about opening a pizza takeout and delivery business. She’s in a pickle since some of her family members think it’s a poor idea, while others disagree. She’s counting on you, a business student, to assist her in making a decision. Provide three reasons why your friend should/should not enter the Pizza sector based on an external review of the overall environment and the industry [including dangers and possibilities]. Take a firm stand.
What would be the most profitable position (in the industry value chain) to assume if she has made up her mind to join the industry?
QUESTION 2: What is the business strategy of Papa John’s? Examine the primary resources and capabilities that contribute to this advantage, focusing on two that are more sustainable and two that are not. Justify your response.
Assuming Papa John’s makes a significant change in business strategy, (a) describe the new strategy and (b) recommend critical changes that must be made to ensure that the new strategy produces a competitive advantage. Which of these modifications is the most/least feasible?
INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL
1. You must limit your analysis to the information in the case and not use the internet to obtain other information or data.
2. When quoting a textbook or a case, you are not obligated to add references or citations.
3. You are not permitted to seek up information on the internet. Using www.turnit.in, all assignments will be checked for authenticity (aka plagiarism).
CHECKLIST You have correctly answered both questions.
-Each response should be no more than two pages long. If tables/figures are permitted, two more pages are required.
–
Single-spaced, 12 Times New Roman font is required, with regular 8.5*11 page margins.
Statement of the Thesis
The most serious criticism to the thesis offered in the assignment is raised. The argument is based on extensive research and logical reasoning.
Brings forward a reasonable counter-argument to the thesis offered in the assignment. The majority of the objection is based on study and logic. Raises a counter-argument to the assignment’s thesis. The argument is based on some study and logical reasoning.
Makes an attempt to refute the thesis offered in the assignment. The objection is based on a bare minimum of research and logic. The thesis objection is either non-existent or missing the elements specified in the assignment guidelines.
Contrary to popular belief
Responds to the objection with a forceful and thorough refutation. The reply successfully illustrates that the thesis can survive the criticism and utilizes the charitable and accurate principles.
Provides a counter-argument to the objection. The reply primarily demonstrates that the thesis can resist the objection and primarily employs charitable and accurate concepts.
Provides a succinct response to the objection. The reply demonstrates that the thesis can survive the objection and uses certain charitable and accurate principles.
Attempts to refute the argument; nevertheless, the rebuttal just shows that the thesis can resist the challenge and does not follow the ideals of charity and accuracy.
The reply is either missing or does not include the elements listed in the assignment requirements.
Conclusion
– Makes precise and concise closing remarks that sum up the article completely. The statements take into account the larger debate and/or future research that could provide more insight into the moral solution to the business dilemma.
Offers concluding observations that sum up the essay. The majority of the remarks are focused on the larger debate and/or future research that could provide greater insight into the moral solution to the commercial dilemma. The closing remarks are a little hazy.
Provides concluding remarks that provide a brief summary of the article. The remarks only take a cursory look at the larger debate and/or other research that could provide more insight into the moral solution to business difficulties. The final remarks are ambiguous and/or vague. Attempts are made to include concluding remarks that summarize the essay; nevertheless, the statements do not take into account the broader controversy and/or additional research that might provide additional insight into the moral answer to the business dilemma. The closing remarks are hazy and confusing.
The final remarks are either missing or do not include the elements listed in the assignment requirements.
Context and Purpose of Writing in Written Communication
Demonstrates a rigorous approach to material structure and presentation. The goal of the text is obvious and simple to comprehend. In the sentences and paragraphs, summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally. The paper is easy to work with. Demonstrates a reasonable level of material arrangement and presentation. The writing’s goal is, for the most part, obvious and simple to comprehend. The merging of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes causes various issues. The paper has a nice flow to it.
In written work, demonstrates a weak comprehension of content organization and presentation. Although the aim of the writing is clear, it may not be interwoven throughout the task. The merging of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes has a number of flaws. In certain places, the paper does not flow well.
Content organization and display are very constrained. The writing’s objective isn’t evident. There isn’t much mixing of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. When reading, the paper does not flow smoothly.
The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.
Control of Syntax and Mechanics in Written Communication – Demonstrates precise grasp and arrangement of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. There are no faults in the written work, and it is quite straightforward to understand. Displays syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar, comprehension and organizing. There are only a few minor faults in the written material, and it is mainly understandable.
Basic syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar, are demonstrated. There are a few flaws in the written work that may cause the reader to become distracted.
Basic understanding of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar, is lacking. The reader gets distracted by glaring errors in the written content.
The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.
Formatting Requirements for Written Communication
Throughout the paper, title page, and reference page, employs the required formatting consistently.
Throughout the paper, the proper formatting is displayed. However, there are a few small flaws in the layout.
Throughout the work, he shows a lack of understanding of needed formatting. The layout, on the other hand, does not meet all of the standards.
Fails to demonstrate a fundamental understanding of the needed formatting. There are numerous flaws, making it impossible to identify the layout from the needed style.
The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.
Communication in Writing: Requirement for words The paper’s length is equal to the requisite amount of words.
The paper’s length is practically identical to the acceptable word count.
The paper’s length corresponds to at least three-quarters of the acceptable word count.
The paper’s length is at least one-half of the acceptable word count.
The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.
Resource Requirement for Written Communication
Uses more scholarly sources than is required, offering strong proof to back your beliefs. Within the body of the assignment, all of the sources listed on the reference page are used and credited correctly.
Supports concepts with the required amount of scholarly sources. Within the body of the assignment, all of the sources listed on the reference page are used and credited correctly. To support concepts, he uses fewer references than is required. It’s possible that some of the sources aren’t scholarly. The majority of the sources listed on the reference page are used in the body of the paper. It’s possible that citations aren’t formatted appropriately.
Uses a small number of sources with little or no evidence to back up ideas. It’s possible that the sources used aren’t scholarly. The majority of the sources listed on the reference page are not used in the body of the paper. Citations are incorrectly formatted. The assignment is either missing or does not contain the elements listed in the instructions.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Case Study, Papa John’s International Inc |
Case Study, Papa John’s International Inc