Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Caste Discrimination in India Discussion Project
answer the question from the links I gave you. The first link is reading and the second link is the movie.
Why does caste discrimination persist in India despite being outlawed? Choose examples from the Mayell (2003) reading and the films shown in class to support your answer. ( your answer should be 300 words)
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/pages/article/i…
Question Description
I’m working on a Political Science question and need guidance to help me study.
Topic: Susan Okin criticizes both John Rawls and Micheal Walzer for failing to deal with the injustices of the family. What are her major points? Do you agree with her? If so, why? If not, why not?
Paper details:
Okin criticizes both Rawls and Walzer for failing to deal with the injustices of the family. What are her major points? Do you agree with her? If so, why? If not, why not? I do not agree with her because Susan Okin is a strong believer in feminism and degrades the male work.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Caste Discrimination in India Discussion Project |
Caste Discrimination in India Discussion Project