Catholic Church and Racism Presentation
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Catholic Church and Racism Presentation
1. Your general summary of what the reading says. Dont rehearse its every detail but instead risk summarizing what you think is its overall meaning and why the author sees it as important. Before you say what you think about it (#2 below), first show you know what the author is trying to say and why. This should include one very clear sentence that states your version of the author(s) thesis or theses (or main idea); and this is to be set within a paragraph or two of your general summary and review of key points. Put that sentence on a slide (from the slideshow above) along with a picture that might illustrate the days meaning. This challenging task of summary is often avoided by students simply restating every single point. Even though you are summarizing the authors point, this is not an objective or neutral task: you are making a decision, using your own analysis, to conceptualize the whole assignment, using your own words, thoughts, and summary. This counts for 40% of this small grade. Take about 2-3 minutes for this.
2. Your response and/or critique of the reading. This is not the same thing as the first point. Rather, in the first you should have charitably stated what you think the author was trying to say, apart from your opinion about it. And in this second point, now that you have proven that you understand the overall thesis, you should now say what you think about it. This can include stating problems or contradictions, affirmations, qualifications, and ways in which the ideas do or do not translate to our current situation. That last point on relating the topic to our current context is required in your own critical analysis. This counts for 40% of this grade. Take about two minutes for this.
3. Conclude with at least two specific questions, which can be put at the bottom of your second slide. These should spark some conversation or ask for clarification that couldnt have been attained by a mere quick web search. This counts for 20% of this grade. Some questions are better than others; dull questions will get a dull grade. Think incisive questions about implications and interpretation, not just clarifications of historical data. Take just one minute for these
4. I dont have the book but i attached two articles that talks about it
5. its should be power poin
I think with 8 to 10 slides you should be cover each párt. Please include a strong paragraph for each slides.
I have to talk for at least two minutes for part one – and two minutes for part two and one minutes for part one
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Catholic Church and Racism Presentation
Catholic Church and Racism Presentation