CCSD Socio Technical Systems Discussion Essay

September 18, 2022

CCSD Socio Technical Systems Discussion Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

CCSD Socio Technical Systems Discussion Essay

TOPIC: Design of Socio-technical Systems: What Does the Practice Tell Us?

Looking at socio-technical principles in the design of their work systems, write about your thoughts:

To what extent do employees engage with decision-making, change in work practices, and job satisfaction?

Based on the finding revealing employees would prefer more responsibilities, more involvement in the decision making, and in the change of work practices. Do you think that employees in the USA feel the same? Do some research and support your claims.

How about the recognition and appreciation by management? Is it the same here in all countries? Do you agree with the assertion of the paper claiming: socio-technical principles are not outdated.

Venezuela Under Hugo Chávez and Beyond Case Study Questions

I’m stuck on a business question and need an explanation.

Please read Case 2: “Venezuela under Hugo Chávez and Beyond” available in your e-book (page no.611), and answer the following questions:

Assignment Question(s):

Under Chávez’s leadership, what kind of economic system was put in place in Venezuela? How would you characterize the political system?

How do you think that Chávez’s unilateral changes to contracts with foreign oil companies will affect future investment by foreigners in Venezuela?

How will the high level of public corruption in Venezuela affect future growth rates?

During the Chávez years, many foreign multinationals exited Venezuela or reduced their exposure there. What do you think the impact of this has been on Venezuela? What needs to be done to reverse the trend?

By 2016, Venezuela’s economy appeared to be on the brink of total collapse. What do you think needs to be done to reverse this?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met