Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
CE 356 Term paper requirements
· Term paper should be typed, double-spaced, 12 pt font, 1-inch margins on all borders.
· Term paper should be accomplished by the group (3-4 students per group).
· Due Dates
First draft: Nov 20th, 2020 (not mandatory)
Final paper: Dec 11th, 2020 (exam day)
· Word Limit:
Minimum 2500 words (excluding figures, tables, and references)
· Reference:
At least 5 journal references should be summarized and cited for your term paper.
Term paper content
The current state of the art relevant to SARS-CoV-2 in water
Term paper layout
· Introduction
· Briefly describe the selected topic.
· What problem needs to be solved?
· Why is the topic important?
· The new studies of the chosen topic
· What is the developmental stage? Are there any techniques available to solve that problem?
· Critiques and recommendations
· Describe the limitations of the current studies in this field
· Provide recommendations for future research, practice, or policy that stem directly from your critiques.
· Conclusion/summary
· What is the overall take-home message from the chosen topic?
· References
Presentation (Dec 1st and 3rd, 2020)
· Presentation: 5-10 min.
Presentation topic should be the same as the term paper topic
Some topics you could choose are listed below. Or, you can select your own ones.
Note: The references listed below is not exclusive. Please do your own research too.
Topic 1: SARS-CoV-2 in water environments: Occurrence and persistence
References:
Water matrices as potential source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission An overview from environmental perspective
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak: some serious consequences with urban and rural water cycle
Recreational waters A potential transmission route for SARS-CoV-2 to humans?
Making Waves: Coronavirus detection, presence and persistence in the water environment: State of the art and knowledge needs for public health
Presence and vitality of SARS-CoV-2 virus in wastewaters and rivers
Coronavirus in water environments: Occurrence, persistence and concentration methods A scoping review
Topic 2: SARS-CoV- in water and wastewater services: presence, impacts and risks
References:
Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in Water and Wastewater
SARS-CoV-2 in water services: presence and impacts
Will SARS-CoV-2 reset public health requirements in the water industry? Integrating lessons of the past and emerging research
Rethinking wastewater risks and monitoring in light of the COVID-19 pandemic
COVID-19 and Recycled Wastewater Irrigation: A Review of Implications
Study on Wastewater in Milan and Turin (Italy) shows SARS-CoV-2 already present in December 2019
SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: State of the knowledge and research needs
What are the implications of COVID-19 for purified recycled water?
SARS-CoV-2 known and unknowns, implications for the water sector and wastewater-based epidemiology to support national responses worldwide: early review of global experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic
Can the susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 to UV radiation be inferred by comparison of its viral structure with well-studied waterborne viruses?
Reactivity of Enveloped Virus Genome, Proteins, and Lipids with Free Chlorine and UV254
OPINION: Faecal shedding of SARS-CoV-2, a snapshot of current data and implications for the water industry
Presence of SARS-Coronavirus-2 in sewage
SARS-CoV-2: What is its fate in urban water cycles and how can the water research community respond?
Topic 3: Wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2
Reference:
Sewage analysis as a tool for the COVID-19 pandemic response and management: the urgent need for optimised protocols for SARS-CoV-2 detection and quantification
Rapid expert consultation on environmental surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: summary report (2020)
Poop tests stop COVID-19 outbreak at University of Arizona
Rethinking wastewater risks and monitoring in light of the COVID-19 pandemic
WHO Scientific Brief 5 Aug 2020: Status of environmental surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 virus
Comparison of virus concentration methods for the RT-qPCR-based recovery of murine hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 from untreated wastewater
SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: State of the knowledge and research needs
SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in primary municipal sewage sludge as a leading indicator of COVID-19 outbreak dynamics
New Paper: First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: A proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community
Can a Paper-Based Device Trace COVID-19 Sources with Wastewater-Based Epidemiology?
2
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |