Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Change in Evidence Based Practice Discussion
please respond to the following discussion post as a peer making a comment on the post. When implementing any evidence-based changes in practice, it is important to have buy-in from all stakeholders to adopt the new change and unify procedures, standards, or policies. Including stakeholders in the process of change allow for important insight about barriers for the department or facility to successfully implement the desired evidence-based practice changes.
Physician buy-in to evidence-based practice changes is important as it directly affects the patient outcome as the physicians lead the direction of patient care and the health care professionals of the facility. Nurses are especially important to successfully implement change as they work in multidisciplinary teams and across many different departments within a hospital facility. Nurses are also directly involved in providing health care to patients, which not only establishes a relationship with patients but also may be able to influence the patients’ acceptance of evidence-based changes as well. The CEO of the facility sets the pace and direction for the facility as a whole, and the administrative team provides support to the facility’s staff by eliminating barriers or any resistance to adopting the proposed changes. The administrative team and facility’s management structure are critical in providing the required leadership to implement the changes. Coordinated collaboration is needed across stakeholder groups to successfully implement evidence-based practices from the beginning of implementation (Beidas et al., 2016), so while direction from the physicians and administration is important, cooperation from all affected groups is needed. Showing that changing to evidence-based practices improves patient outcomes may appeal to physicians, nurses, and patients, while showing the increased efficiencies of treatment methods may appeal more to the administrative team. Regardless of the group of stakeholders, it is important to identify their unique perspectives and address any specific concerns of that group. By utilizing strategies that clearly communicate the desired goal, changes needed to achieve that goal, and providing education and reducing barriers for implementation can increase support for adopting evidence-based practices.
References:
Beidas, R. S., Stewart, R. E., Adams, D. R., Fernandez, T., Lustbader, S., Powell, B. J., Aarons, G., Hoagwood, K. E., Evans, A. C., Hurford, M. O., Rubin, R., Hadley, T., Mandell, D., & Barg, F. (2016). A Multi-Level Examination of Stakeholder Perspectives of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in a Large Urban Publicly-Funded Mental Health System. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 43(6), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0705-2
Cluzeau, F., Wedzicha, J. A., Kelson, M., Corn, J., Kunz, R., Walsh, J., & Schünemann, H. J. (2012). Stakeholder Involvement: How to Do It Right. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 9(5), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.201208-062ST
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Change in Evidence Based Practice Discussion |
Change in Evidence Based Practice Discussion