Characteristics Distinguishing Services from Goods Assignment

March 21, 2022

Characteristics Distinguishing Services from Goods Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Characteristics Distinguishing Services from Goods Assignment

There are six unique characteristics distinguishing services from goods. These characteristics are intangibility, inseparability, perishability, client relationship, customer effort, and uniformity. Discuss each characteristic as to how services differ from goods. Be sure to provide a specific aviation service example. You may present your findings in a table or bullet format.

Limit your paper to 400 words, excluding references (no cover/title page is necessary). Format and cite your paper in current APA style.

There are six distinct features that set services apart from other types of products. Intangibility, inseparability, perishability, client connection, customer effort, and uniformity are all qualities of the product. Discuss how services vary from products in each of these characteristics. Make sure to provide a concrete example of an aircraft service. Tables and bullets may be used to display your results.

Including references, keep your paper to 400 words or less (no cover or title page is required). Use the most recent APA style manual to format and reference your work.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met