CMN 1100 Individual Communication Paper

October 6, 2022

CMN 1100 Individual Communication Paper

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

CMN 1100 Individual Communication Paper

Instruction: Describe an occasion when an individual communication experience affected your sense of the following: organizational identification, work performance, trust, communication, and job satisfaction. Describe these components in the organization, how and why these aspects were impacted by the individual. This journal should be 1 page double-spaced, 12-point font.

I have written a small part of it. I need your help to explain it in more detail so that the paper can be 1 page long. Here is what I write:

“Being reprimanded in public or in front of our colleagues is so damaging that it can lead to loss of morale and motivation and can even adversely affect our work performance. It is essential for managers to know where and when to reprimand workers. Professionalism and values dictate that reprimanding people must be done in private. Humans, as we are, have emotions and feelings that must be considered when reprimanding for errors or mistakes committed in the workplace. Reprimanding workers for mistakes committed is not an issue because it is the managers’ job to correct mistakes and reprimand if necessary. The problem lies in how the managers communicate or reprimand the person.”

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met