Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Codes of Conduct Ethics in the Workplace
DEFINITION: a brief definition of the main phrase followed by the term’s APA reference; this does not count toward the word count.
SUMMARY: Write a summary of the article in your own words that is between 150 and 200 words long. Make a note of the article’s author, their qualifications, and why we should believe his or her ideas, research, or discoveries about the key term.
DISCUSSION: In 300-350 words, make a brief discussion of how the article connects to the selected chapter Key Term in your own words. A discussion is an opportunity for you to contribute value by sharing your experiences, thoughts, and opinions, rather than rehashing what was already expressed in the article. This is the most crucial aspect of the project.
REFERENCES: All references must be given in APA format at the bottom of the submission.
Please use the aforementioned structure, which includes no plagiarism, APA formatting, and the addition of citations and references. Use one recent (within the last three years) peer-reviewed scholarly journal article that closely relates to the subject.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Codes of Conduct Ethics in the Workplace