Communications Social and Real Interests Question

September 20, 2022

Communications Social and Real Interests Question

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Communications Social and Real Interests Question

Instructions:

Go to O*NET (Links to an external site.)

Click Advanced Search

Select Interests

From the Interests list, select top 2 interests of yours

For each Interest, select at least 3 occupations that stood out for you.

For each occupation you select, write a short summery and share why did you select it.

Assignment:

You must submit your assignment by Sunday at 11:59 pm. You can upload a file like a word document or PDF by clicking the blue submit button on the upper right side of this page or you may type your text directly into canvas. For this assignment, you should submit your top 2 Interests and a total of 6 occupations with their summaries and your thoughts (each 3 occupations should belong to the same interest).

Chicago social media and Fake News Paper

Due Friday 2pm CT

Before social media platforms DE platformed Trump in the wake of the Jan 6, 2021 insurrection, they sought to manage his disinformation campaigns through moderating and flagging his spread of hate speech. Compare how Facebook and Twitter handled Trump in 2020 via the hyperlinks below comment on the role social media played in his disinformation campaigns before his full DE platforming on Jan 6, 2021.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/trumps-statement…

https://www.theverge.com/21275532/trump-twitter-so…

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-new…

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/us/politics/tru…

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jun/08…

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/18/880377872/facebook-…

https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/29/21275173/twit…

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met