Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Community Development Diversity and Inclusivity Discussion
Respond to two peers with resources or recommendations of strategies to support ongoing professional development.
Student post down below:
Collaboration involves a process of joint decision making among key stakeholders of a problem domain about the future of that domain. Five features are critical to the process: (1) the stakeholders are interdependent, (2) solutions emerge by dealing constructively with differences, (3) joint ownership of decisions is involved, (4) stakeholders assume collective responsibility for the future direction of the domain, and (5) collaboration is an emergent process(Heath & Isbell, 2017).
Key to the successful practice of collaboration is the commitment stakeholders must have to principles of sharing power and building a vision by integrating one another’s interests. Stakeholders and collaborating groups may erode trust with the public and with each other if they do not take into
account the political and social significance of their actions. Trust is lost when marginalized voices are limited from participating in the process and when collaborations appear to be more symbolic than authentic in their efforts to engage cross-sector organizational partners in decision making. The
three chapters that follow address three additional cornerstones of ethics: diversity, shared power, and principled leadership (Heath & Isbell, 2017).
My strengths are my work ethics, working with diversity, getting people to listen and agree with any suggestions or ideas that I have that would be beneficial to the team. Also, I do not have a problem with sharing power. Although I am a leader and leading is something that I am used to doing, I am
able to take in other thoughts, and I can handle constrictive criticism. Being a military brat and wife, diversity isn’t an issue because ai have always been around a wide diverse of people. My weaknesses are getting overwhelmed and being strong will and not allowing people to help when I feel this
way. I also tend to shut down at times due to me being upset with the team, because I want to take time to calm down before I approach a situation, so that I won’t hurt anyone feelings. I feel that I should be more patience when someone messes up something and allowing that person to fix the
problem (leaning purposes), rather than just taking it and fixing it. Me being in the ‘Civilian World”, these last four years has been a journey for me, because I am used to a more structured environment. Finding resources to help me become more patience and allowing others to fix the issue is something that I strongly need to look into. So, looking back at it, my weakness may be shred power because I have a habit of taking the lead and taking over.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Community Development Diversity and Inclusivity Discussion |
Community Development Diversity and Inclusivity Discussion