Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Company D Financial Reporting Discussion Paper
On January 1, 2020 Company D established a cash settled share appreciation plan for 50executives of the company.
Here are the relevant details:
Each executive received 5,000 rights
The benchmark price established was $ 20.
Each executive had the right to receive cash for share appreciation over the benchmark price times the number of rights issued to them.
The plan expires on December31, 2024
The rights vest after 3 years (December 31, 2022)
At the end of 2020 2 executives leave and it is estimated that 4 more will leave before the vesting date.
At the end of 2021 2 more executives leave and it is now estimated that 10 more will leave before the vesting date.
At the end of 2022 10 more executives leave.
At the end of 2022 18 executives exercise their rights
At the end of 202312 executives exercise their rights
At the end of 2024 6 executives exercise their rights
SAR fair value and market price information is as follows:
December 31, 2020 FV=$3.60 MP = $ 21.40
December 31, 2021 FV=$3.30 MP = $ 22.10
December 31, 2022 FV=$4.10 MP = $ 22.75
December 31, 2023 FV=$5.10 MP = $ 24.00
December 31, 2024 FV=$3.50 MP = $ 23.50
Question:
Using IFRS prepare journal entries for the years 2020to 2024including the deferred tax entries for each year.Assume a tax rate of 40% for all years.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Company D Financial Reporting Discussion Paper |
Company D Financial Reporting Discussion Paper