Comparative Health Systems Term Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Comparative Health Systems Term Paper
In this assignment, you will demonstrate MPH Competency 4.1: Compare the organization, structure and function of health care, public health and regulatory systems across national and international settings
You will be comparing the United States to another country of your choosing in terms of the adequacy of the health care, public health and regulatory system response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Do not pick a country for which there is no national data.
Assignment description:
Compare and contrast how the
1) health care,
2) public health and
3) regulatory systems
of the United States and another country responded to the pandemic. Address each system separately.
Please start each section with a concise discussion of the health care, public health and regulatory systems as they are supposed to work in ‘normal’ times.
Next describe at least 2 changes the country made for each of the 3 systems in response to the pandemic
Then proceed to compare and contrast how each of these systems responded to the pandemic in the two countries using the data you found. Which country did a better job and why?
Back up this section with country wide data rather than any particular state/city/province or other jurisdiction. Please provide references that back up your findings.
Details:
Do not include a cover page
3 pages single-spaced for text of paper
1 additional page for references/bibliography
Don’t go over the 3 page limit, as any text > 3 pages will not be read
Your name should be on the top right of every page
Paginate at the bottom right of the page
All references must be appropriately cited (AMA or APA styles are recommended)
Font size = 12
Label each section as health care, public health, or regulatory
There is a 3-point automatic penalty for mistakes in format/page limit/references/other instructions.
This is not a group project; the paper should reflect your own work
Validate references, they will be checked. All references must be in English.
All assignments must be professionally written and formatted and use language appropriate for the intended audience. Assume the audience is public health professionals. Remember to use the assignment guidelines posted in the syllabus.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow