compare and contrast acquisition indebtedness and home-equity loans
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
compare and contrast acquisition indebtedness and home-equity loans
WEEK THREE DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- Please compare and contrast acquisition indebtedness and home-equity loans
- Why might it be good advice from a tax perspective to think hard before deciding to quickly pay down mortgage debt?
- Are employees or self-employed taxpayers more likely to qualify for the home office deduction? Please explain.
- What can home equity loan be used for? Any restrictions?
- What could be the benefit for the lender on home-equity loans?
- How would you compare home-equity loans to credit card debt?
- If someone is well stocked on the emergency fund and has a steady stream of income, does it make sense to pay down his mortgage, if he has received a good sized bonus? Is it more beneficial to pay down mortgage and lower the overall interest payment on the loan, or keep the high level of deductible interest?
- What about emergency funds? How much emergency funds should one prepare for the rainy days?
ANSWER EACH QUESTION IN 200 OR MORE WORDS.
USE CITATIONS AND REFERENCES
USE APA GUIDELINES PLEASE
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow compare and contrast acquisition indebtedness and home-equity loans