Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Comparing Average Annual Percent of Diabetic Medicare Enrollees Age 65-75 Years
Hemoglobin A1c Between Maryland and Virginia
I. Quantitative Analysis
Step #3: Performing Quantitative data analysis design. This is very similar to Individual Assignments 1 and 2 (please look at the instructions for more details).
For this section:
Select one of the class data sets
Identify relevant variables
Indicate the statistical method you used for your analysis
Identify the statistical software your team used to run the statistical analysis focusing on EXCEL or RStudio (BONUS points) as the main software (you can use any other software such as SAS, STATA or SPSS, but the master-code will be available only for RStudio)
Analyze the data, state your conclusions and support them, this section should include:
Hypothesis or research questions with a short paragraph to discuss the issue.
Research Method for this section first report the table of variables, then define the variables using the example provided in step-by-step instruction.
Report the software and type of analysis you performed in this section including descriptive table and plots
Discuss your findings
Discussion: for this section, compare your finding with the LR (literature review) you performed in the first section
Recommendations: suggest a few policy recommendations based on your findings and LR.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Comparing Average Annual Percent of Diabetic Medicare Enrollees |
Comparing Average Annual Percent of Diabetic Medicare Enrollees