Components and Levels of Abstraction in Nursing Knowledge

Components and Levels of Abstraction in Nursing Knowledge

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839

Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

Components and Levels of Abstraction in Nursing Knowledge

Description / paper instructions

Discuss the components of the Conceptual-Theoretical-Empirical structure and how it supports the development of nursing knowledge. Provide references.

Identify the C-T-E structure in the included two articles (SEE ATTACHED FILES)

Article 1:

Conceptual Framework:
Theory:
Empirical Indicators (Instruments to Measure the Concepts):

Article 2:

Conceptual Framework:
Theory:
Empirical Indicators (Instruments to Measure the Concepts)

Please pay close attention to in-test citations!

Please refer to the included textbooks focusing on:

Reed and Shearer:

Ch. 33: Levels of Theoretical Thinking in Nursing
Ch. 34: Situation Specific Theories
Ch. 35: Middle Range Theories
Ch. 40: Perspectives on Nursing Theory
Ch. 41: Evaluation of Nursing Theories as Per Fawcett
Ch. 42: Parse’s Criteria for Evaluation of Theory with a Comparison of Fawcett’s and Parse’s Approaches

Peterson and Bredow:

Ch. 2: Analysis, Evaluation, and Selection of Middle Range Nursing Theory

?Perspectives on Nursing Theory 6th .pdf

Components and Levels of Abstraction in Nursing Knowledge

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Components and Levels of Abstraction in Nursing Knowledge

Components and Levels of Abstraction in Nursing Knowledge

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!