Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
ART 1 OF THE DISCUSSION PROMPT: INTRODUCTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Introductions (beginnings) and conclusions serve to frame an article and contribute to its overall cohesion. The topic and key idea are introduced in the introduction (thesis). The opening has two purposes: it piques the reader’s interest and establishes the essay’s direction and scope. It acclimates the reader to what is about to be read. The thesis is reaffirmed (said in a different way) and the concepts are completed in the conclusion. For the reader, the conclusion brings the article to a satisfying end.
Two introduction paragraphs for an essay on the necessity of training children to swim are provided below. Answer the following questions after reading and analyzing the two paragraphs:
Which of the two introductions is the more effective? Give an explanation for your response. Make a list of the advantages and disadvantages of each introduction.
What would the essay’s body be like (assuming you chose the more effective introduction)? What sort of proof would be included? In your response, be particular rather than broad.
Make a good title for your essay.
For each of these introductions, who would be an appropriate audience?
Keep in mind that your response should be written in complete sentences that make sense on their own. In other words, your responses should be in line with the question you’re responding to.
1st introduction
Humans live in a world that is more than 70% water. We have developed millions of swimming pools for sports and recreational activities in addition to these vast bodies of water. Most people will be confronted with either the danger of drowning or the challenge of aquatic leisure at some point in their lives. It is critical that we learn to swim for these reasons. I understand the value of understanding how to swim as a competitive swimmer and a swimming instructor.
2nd Introduction
Carl, a curious four-year-old like most kids, walked out onto his pool patio last spring. He fell into the pool and sank to the bottom helplessly since he couldn’t swim. His uncle discovered the youngster minutes later and carried him to the surface. Carl had no pulse, so his uncle started CPR right away until the paramedics arrived. He was eventually resurrected. His mother enrolled him in beginner swimming lessons while he was in the hospital. Carl was extremely fortunate. He was given a second opportunity, unlike hundreds of other youngsters and adults.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Conclusions and introductions Discussion |
Conclusions and introductions Discussion