Confidentiality and Transparency Assignment for an Essay solution

Confidentiality and Transparency Assignment for an Essay

Instructions:

Confidentiality and Transparency Assignment for an Essay

Description

Dr. Frank Matravers noticed a number of other employees at Pleasantville Medical Hospital heading to the hospital administrator’s office for 10 minutes at a time one day at work. Then Matravers gets a phone from the administrator’s office, asking him to come in at 2:00 p.m. When Matravers arrives, he is surprised to see Janine Chou, the Hospital’s legal counsel. Chou explains that she is assisting the hospital in the investigation of a HIPAA “privacy” rule violation. (The Health

Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 is known as HIPPAA.) Don’t get caught up in the legalese when answering this question.)

“Have you discussed any of the hospital’s patients with anyone who is not a hospital employee in the recent three weeks?” Chou inquires. Have you ever talked about a patient outside of the hospital?” Matravers says genuinely that he does not believe he has.

“Are you aware of any other hospital staff who has done so?” Chou asks. Matravers honestly states that he is unable to recall any such instance.

Matravers watches the local news that evening and is taken aback when the top story is about his hospital’s handling of a “notorious” sex offender. The patient is being treated for mental health difficulties, according to the story. The patient’s name is given, along with the fact that he has been in the hospital for three weeks for therapy. Matravers then realizes that he has heard about this from Dr. Isabella Gardner, one of the hospital’s psychiatrists. He first learned about it two weeks

prior, while dining with Gardner and her husband, as well as another of the hospital’s doctors, at a local restaurant. Gardner had informed them about a patient who had recently relocated to Pleasantville after serving 20 years in jail for many sexual crimes on the other end of the state. He couldn’t leave the state while on probation, but he desperately wanted to get out of a town where everyone knew his story. She claimed that her patient was depressed and had sleep issues, but

she questioned if he was genuinely guilty of the murders based on his case history and their chats.

The exchange was just standard “shop banter” between coworkers at the time. However, because the conversation took place at a restaurant, it’s possible that some of what Gardner said was overheard by others. Gardner’s spouse, who did not

work at the hospital, was undoubtedly aware of the events! Who knows what else Gardner told her husband about her coworkers’ patients?

Matravers recognizes after seeing the news story that he did not offer Chou an accurate answer concerning other hospital personnel. He did, in fact, break HIPAA by listening to Gardner, and he knows of two other workers, Gardner and the second doctor who attended the meal, who also broke HIPAA.

Your argument is as follows: To defend your argument on this issue, use the material from the given readings: Is it ethical for the hospital to reveal who it treats as a patient, or is there a moral obligation to keep this information private? Is it

Matravers’ moral obligation to return to Chou and report the dinner conversation? As a result, Matravers and Gardner may be suspended from work for a week without pay. (Do not be concerned about their legal commitments.)

Confidentiality and Transparency Assignment for an Essay

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Confidentiality and Transparency Assignment for an Essay

Confidentiality and Transparency Assignment for an Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!