Copyright Law Fair Use and Creative Commons Essay

October 6, 2022

Copyright Law Fair Use and Creative Commons Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Your summary should be detailed and answer the following questions using information you find from the various resources below. You do not need to use all of the resources. You will need to cite at least five sources.

What is Fair Use, Copyright Law, and Creative Commons?

What is the Four Factor Test?

What are the consequences when you violate copyright law?

How will you uphold the laws and guidelines?

Resources

For this assignment we wanted to start your investigation with several articles. You may start with these websites, videos and articles, or you may search for your own. Please remember to cite your work.

ASU Library- Copyright and Fair Use (Links to an external site.)

How to use content that isn’t yours (Links to an external site.)

3 Rules to avoid violating Fair Use on YouTube (Links to an external site.)

Creative Commons – About the Licenses (Links to an external site.)

Flickr Creative Commons (Links to an external site.)

The Four Factor Test (Links to an external site.)

Stanford Fair Use and Copyright: Public Domain (Links to an external site.)

What are the consequences when you break the copyright law? (Links to an external site.)

Applying Fair Use to New Technologies (Links to an external site.)

Is Fair Use a license to steal? (Links to an external site.)

Teaching Copyright: a project of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (Links to an external site.)

Creating Your Memes

What is a Meme? Well, according to Merriam-Webster Dictionary…

“A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.”

For this assignment, you are going to create three memes that assist in summarizing your findings. Please read the bullets below to learn more about what we are looking for. Your meme should:

Inform/educate us about Fair Use, Copyright Law, and Creative Commons.

Be witty/insightful/funny (PG/PG13 please!)

Be labeled “Created by <your name>

Have a Creative Commons license to indicate how others can reuse your creation. You can create your license here: https://creativecommons.org/choose/ (Links to an external site.). There are two ways to record your license on your meme: image or text. Choose one.

Text example: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Image example:

Example meme:

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met