Core Concepts of Breadth and Depth of a Material
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Core Concepts of Breadth and Depth of a Material
Core Concepts of Breadth and Depth of a Material
MGMT 645 Forum Description and Grading Rubric Exemplary Level
Meeting all requirements that include this criterion will earn a maximum of 50 points
Core Concepts: 25 Student analyzes and synthesizes research to demonstrate core concepts. Posts reflect student’s critical thinking abilities. Student demonstrates comprehension of breadth and depth of material. X/25 Mastery Level
Meeting all requirements that include this criterion will earn a maximum of 40 points
Engagement: 10 Student participates and is interactive in the dialogue with thoughtful peer replies that further the discussion. X/10 Competency Level
Meeting the requirements of the four criteria areas will earn a maximum of 15 points
APA: 5 Mechanics: 5 Organization: 5 Student follows APA formatting guidelines with at least two citations (in-text and reference list match) in each post from peer-reviewed journals. Sentence structure, grammar, diction; correct use of punctuation; minimal to no spelling errors; no run-on sentences or comma splices. Posts contains an introduction, supporting body, conclusion and reference page. Ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other. The reader can follow the line of reasoning.
X/5 X/5 X/5 Every week you will research & respond to two topics posted in the weekly forum. A detailed and thoughtful response to both topics is required (minimum of 500 words per response).
Additionally, emphasis is placed on your ability to conduct and synthesize scholarly research.
Your posts should be professional in content and follow the APA standards.
July 14, 2011
Study of Low Income Women The data in the dataset comes from a longitudinal study of low-income women in four
urban communities. In the original study, extensive information was collected in 1999 (Wave 1) and 2001 (Wave 2) from
about 4,000 women. A major purpose of the study was to understand the life trajectories of these women and their
children during a period of major changes to social policies affecting poor people in the United States. The sample was randomly selected from women who, in 1995, were single mothers receiving cash welfare assistance in the four cities.
All data were collected by means of 90-minute in-person interviews in either English or Spanish in the study participants’
homes. Professional interviewers from a survey research firm, specially trained for this study, collected the data. The
participants provided information which include their age at the time of interview, age at first birth, Race/ethnicity, educational attainment, current marital status, number of children living in home over the past month, poverty status,
number of emergency room visits in the past 12 months, number of doctor visits in the past 12 months, if they are a
smoker, height, weight, body mass index, number of live births, number of miscarriages, total number of pregnancies,
how often they got drunk over the past month, how often they smoked marijuana, crack, their level of depression, and
whether they drink, use pot, or crack at all. A measurement of their physical and mental health status was also included
in the survey, The women’s physical and mental health status was measured using the Short Form 12 Health Survey, commonly referred to as the SF-12. The SF-12 is a 12-item scale providing a generic, multidimensional measure of
health status, and has been used in numerous nursing and healthcare studies. Six of the 12 items measure physical
health, and the remaining items measure mental health. Use the dataset attached Independent Project.xls and
StatCrunch to provide the following for the variable(s) of your choice:
- Frequency distribution of a variable and bar graph of the same variable
- Descriptives of a continuous variable: mean, median, skewness, kurtosis, standard deviation and graph of that variable
- Cross tabulation of two variables with Chi Square
- Comparison of the effect of three or more groups (single variable) on a single continuous variable
- Scatterplot of two continuous variables
- Correlation between the two continuous variables from #5 above with regression
Think carefully about what kind of variables to choose for the given tasks.
A short descriptive statement should accompany each of the above including a description of the variables used and any meaning that may be attached to the results. Be sure to use only the data from this data set. Grading points:
3 points for each task 1-6:
1 point each for variable choice, appropriate display/test, description of result.
2 points for overall format/readability/construct (neat and tidy)
Core Concepts of Breadth and Depth of a Material
Core Concepts of Breadth and Depth of a Material
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow