Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Coronary Heart Disease Risks Discussion Study Paper
Discussion: Coronary Heart Disease Risks
Many Americans consume more protein than they require. Many times this results in a high intake of fat which may contribute to high cholesterol and high LDL levels resulting in atherosclerosis and heart disease. Go to http://www.heartsite.com (Links to an external site.), and click “Diseases” then click “Coronary Artery Disease”. Read the information there and answer the following in the discussion area:
1.Do you have any of the risk factors? What are they? Which ones can you reduce and how?
——————
Simone Patton
Dr. Karpel
HEAL 2
June 15, 2020
Thankfully, I do not have high cholesterol, high blood pressure, diabetes, am not smoking, or have a family history of coronary heart disease, but I am still at risk because I am obese, hardly exercise, and am sometimes stressed. Additionally, I am 46 years old, which puts me close to the “above 50 age group” risk. I could reduce my risk factors by losing weight and becoming more active on a regular basis. Genetic risks factors can be high cholesterol and high blood pressure, but they can be environmental as well, per example having high cholesterol due to a poor diet. Type 2 Diabetes seems to be environmental as well, even though family history could influence the risk as well. Smoking, obesity, lack of exercise, and stress are environmental risk factors because we are the cause for it. But the more I read about the risk factors it seems like they each have a little bit of both, genetic and environmental causes.
Coronary Heart Disease Risks Discussion Study Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Coronary Heart Disease Risks Discussion Study Paper |
Coronary Heart Disease Risks Discussion Study Paper