Corporate Democracy and Democratic Workplace Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Corporate Democracy and Democratic Workplace Discussion
I’m working on a sociology question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Question 1 of 3: Why does Ross equate a just workplace with a democratic workplace (i.e. a corporate democracy)? Think of justice as fairness, so in other words, why is Ross equating a fair workplace as a democratic workplace?
Question 2 of 3: Provide an example of a corporate democracy. Why is your chosen company an example of a corporate democracy? Do you think that this is a desirable management system?
Question 3 of 3: Ross details the hidden costs of a humane workplace, and he essentially argues that alienation is the most harmful. Review “the 4As” from The Precariat in the module on Social Class (and Discussion Board 3). Do you think that the hidden costs of the humane workplace would also produce “the 4As”? Which ones? Why or why not?
Arts of Resistance Discussion
I’m working on a sociology multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Part 1 of 4: provide an example of art that makes the hidden transcript visible or known to the wider public, and paste the link. They can include: songs, paintings/murals/graffiti, Performances or poems or literature, any other artistic works
Part 2 of 4: What is the hidden transcript that is being made visible or known? (in your interpretation)
Part 3 of 4: Explain how the piece of art makes the hidden transcript visible or known.
Part 4 of 4: Is your example an instance of infrapolitics, subcultures of resistance, or both? Why?
Corporate Democracy and Democratic Workplace Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow