Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Correlation Coefficient For HF Symptoms And Depressive Symptoms
Quantitative Data Analysis Activity
Instructions: Read each table and answer the questions below each one.
Reading Descriptive Tables
- How many nurses total were in the sample?
- How many GICU nurses assessed the patient prior to suctioning?
- What percentage of GICU nurses failed to prepare he patient prior to suctioning?
- How many GICU nurses did not prehyperoxygenate prior to suctioning?
- What percentage of CICU nurses did not instill NaCl prior to suctioning?
Reading Correlational Tables
- Which pair of variables have a strong positive correlation?
- Which pairs of variables have a moderate negative correlation?
- Which pair of variables has the weakest correlation? Is it positive or negative?
- What is the correlation coefficient for social support and adaptive problem solving? Name the direction and strength of the relationship.
- What is the correlation coefficient for HF symptoms and depressive symptoms? Name the direction and strength of the relationship.
- Which pairs of variables are statistically significant at the p < 0.05 level?
Reading OR/RR Tables
- How many participants were in the sample?
- How many smokers experienced delayed healing?
- What three complications have the lowest RR?
- In plain language, interpret the statistics for delayed healing in relation to smokers.
- In plain language, interpret the statistics for nerve injury in relation to smokers.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results