Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Crim3003 Young People and the Criminal Justice System
3,000 word critically reflective written assignment
A good assignment…
Has an identifiable introduction, main body and concluding section?
Is structured using paragraphs. Each paragraph contains sentences which make points that contribute to an overall ‘line of thought’ (discussion/argument).
Overall, the assignment can be thought of as a written discussion/’argument’ (limited to 3,000 words).
Contains clearly written sentences – using appropriate grammar and punctuation, so that the reader can clearly and easily identify the point(s) being made.
References the work of others. References to the work of others are highly regarded in academic writing for a number of reasons:
Demonstrates awareness of the written thoughts, ideas, arguments (perspectives) of others who have gone before, theories
Give appropriate credit to others for their work/ideas.
Facilitates the ability of the reader to follow-up on a piece of writing/research to check their own interpretation of the methods, findings and conclusions.
Helps trace the development of thought over time.
Presents references according to the Harvard style of referencing.
Ultimately, academic articles constitute part of an ongoing discussion over time.
In the social and political world, there is not one fixed truth. It is to be understood and negotiated over time. We can see the implications of these negotiations in what principles are prioritized, what policies are favoured and what practice they encourage/facilitate.
There are dilemmas, challenges and competing principles/tensions in the operation of the youth justice system. Demonstrating an awareness of these with clarity will tend to achieve higher assignment grades.
The best assignments demonstrate awareness of the connections between theories/theoretical perspectives (thinking), government legislation or policies (instructions/guidelines for action) and the practical consequences that arise from these policies (actions that result in practice).
Addresses the title question, succinctly and clearly.
Makes it clear what decisions have been made and why – what are the most important points to include for discussion (what has a lower priority for this discussion).
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Crim3003 Young People and the Criminal Justice System |
Crim3003 Young People and the Criminal Justice System