Critical Infrastructure and Key Resource Asset Protection Strategies
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Critical Infrastructure and Key Resource Asset Protection Strategies
Type: Individual Project
Unit: Critical Infrastructure and Key Resource Asset Protection Strategies
Due Date: Wed, 9/5/18
Grading Type: Numeric
Points Possible: 100
Points Earned:
Deliverable Length: 2-3 pages
View objectives for this assignment
Go To:
My Work:
Online Deliverables:
Looking for tutoring? Go to Smarthinking
Collapse All | Expand All Collapse All | Expand All
Assignment Details
Assignment Description
You are an Action Officer (AO) assigned to the county Homeland Security Office. The director has requested that you conduct a risk analysis of the county administrative building and courthouse. She is concerned that the existing analysis is outdated, did not conform to the current U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) risk analysis methodology, and did not employ the National Scenarios. The director has informed you of her intention to present your report to the county commission to seek additional funding to expand the Risk Analysis effort to other Critical Infrastructure (CI) facilities within the county and to broaden the county’s CI planning, response, and recovery capabilities.
- Using the DHS risk management framework depicted in the National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) and the key points concerning critical infrastructure protection (CIP) learned thus far, create a simple matrix to facilitate a risk analysis and assessment of your county courthouse or another local government building in your municipality. This is only a notional analysis or assessment to familiarize you with the various factors potentially impacting a real and comprehensive CI risk analysis.
- Note:Do not get frustrated with the unavailable, missing details or facts. Just use your imagination. Focus on the process instead of the missing data.
- Using the matrix that is located in the additional Phase Resources and your analysis, conduct a notional risk analysis of your county courthouse or another government building in your locale.
- Address the risk factors using the situations depicted by the 15 National Planning Scenarios.
- If you feel there are other more likely scenarios that need mentioning, do so.
- This is a formal report. The professionalism, detailed descriptions, and completeness of the report are essential to the director in gaining additional funding.
Please submit your assignment.
Reading Assignment
Broder, Chapters. 12, 13, and 16
Assignment Objectives
- Formulate strategies for protection of critical infrastructure sectors.
Other Information
Instructions:
The correct writing methodology and the FEMA Risk Matrix is provided to you in the Course Resources, Learning Materials in the form of a Writing Template with FEMA Risk Matrix. Use this template so that you will get the format correct and have the Risk Matrix. Both are part of the assignment. This is a building block assignment that goes into the next two individual project (IPs 4 and 5) assignments.
Legend
- Extra Credit
- View Assignment Rubric
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Critical Infrastructure and Key Resource Asset Protection Strategies