Critical Thinking Questions and Personal Application Questions

October 1, 2022

Critical Thinking Questions and Personal Application Questions

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Critical Thinking Questions and Personal Application Questions

. Complete the discussion board assignment below after you have finished reviewing the Chapter and Lesson learning materials.

Locate the Critical Thinking Questions and Personal Application Questions lists at the end of the textbook Chapter 8. The Critical Thinking Questions and Personal Application Questions are easiest to find/review by using the online textbook Chapter 8 table of contents.

Review both Question lists and chose one question from one or the other lists to be the focus of your discussion board post (you are just responding to one question; not two).

Start a new thread in the “Lesson 8 – Memory” discussion board forum and include the following elements in your post:

In the title of your post, identify which list you chose from (Critical Thinking or Personal Application) and include the question number and question text so your fellow students will know what question/issue you are posting about.

In the body of your post, thoroughly address the question you chose. For the best score, keep in mind that your post should demonstrate: that you are contributing to the class/learning community; that your post is of interest to other students and motivates some group discussion/comments; some creativity is evident in your discussion/thinking/communicating about the topic. Your post should have few or no errors in spelling or grammar. APA “in-text” citations & reference list used correctly/appropriately (if applicable) and your thoughts are clearly expressed.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met